Medicare Is Not Medicaid

They are not the same, not even close. Yet both in our minds and in the news media, Medicare and Medicaid are always lumped together. They both start with “M.” Apples and hand grenades are both round: would you mix them together in a salad?

On July 30, 1965, President Lyndon Johnson signed both Medicare and Medicaid into law as part of Title XIX, The Social Security Act. Both are related to healthcare. Both have substantial Federal involvement. There are some individuals who are eligible for both. That is where similarities end.

Medicare
Before 1965, only those who were in the workforce could get employer-subsidized health insurance. Thus, the retired (and the non-working) were effectively prevented from acquiring medical insurance coverage. The Medicare Program was planned, like social security, as a pay-in-advance-of-need system where the worker paid a certain amount each month into a government-run fund. At age 65, when the worker retired, this pot of money called Medicare would provide all his or her medical coverage funding. Initially, the Medicare Fund was maintained and accounted separately but quickly the Federal government lumped it into the General Fund. (I leave it to your imagination why they did this.)

Twenty-five years later (1990), the GAO measured how much Medicare was actually costing versus what was projected. The 1965 legislative calculators were off just a little bit: Medicare then cost more than 800% over projections! The medical insurance plan intended to pay for itself had become a Federal entitlement that was never intended.

Medicaid

Medicaid was always intended as an entitlement – a social welfare and protection plan funded jointly by State and Federal governments. Initially, the Program covered the lower end of the non-working spectrum, children, plus indigents.

Medicaid is a means-tested Program. To qualify, you must make less than a minimum income level, plus you must meet one of the categorical requirements such as age (under 18), pregnancy, disability, blindness, HIV, legal citizenship, etc. In contrast to Medicare, Medicaid recipients pay nothing into any fund. It always was and is an entitlement.

Beware when we tout single payer health insurance funded by the government as a means to provide universal health care that will reduce costs. The upward spiral of healthcare costs will reach the stratosphere – the truly unsupportable – for two reasons. 1) As entitlements expand, costs go UP certainly not down. 2) The government is a notoriously inefficient provider of, well, anything. When Government takes over an activity, the bureaucracy and its associated costs expand exponentially. Just think of the postal service or HIPAA. If you need additional proof of how costly government-run programs are, just remember the initial estimate for cost of Medicare and compare to the reality.

Medicare Is Not Medicaid.

“Government-run” Is Incompatible With “Cost-saving.”

System MD

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Digg Digg This Post Post to Facebook Facebook Post to StumbleUpon Stumble This Post

41 comments ↓

#1 “MediCare-for-All” –> No-Care-at-All. — Medical Malprocess on 09.26.09 at 3:28 pm

[...] MediCaid, MediCare was never intended as an entitlement. MediCare was supposed to be self-sustaining: people would pay [...]

#2 Doug Lykes on 11.19.10 at 5:56 pm

Seniors whose Medicare Advantage plan is being discontinued “will automatically be enrolled in original Medicare for hospitalization and out-patient coverage, [but] they wouldn’t have prescription coverage or Medigap supplemental insurance that picks up what Medicare doesn’t pay for” unless they choose a new plan

#3 Erik Siron on 11.29.10 at 8:02 pm

Seniors in whose Medicare edge plan has discontinued “will instantly be enrolled in original medicare for hospitalization and even out-patient insurance policy, [but] that they wouldn’t own prescription policy or medicare supplement supplemental insurance plans that picks up what medicare health insurance doesn’t give for” with regard to they choose a new prepare

#4 Nicolas Uhyrek on 11.29.10 at 8:02 pm

as many in concert million medicare health insurance recipients have to choose innovative coverage, according to AARP….for the people with normal Medicare, the most important change beingshown to people there is some sort of expansion in benefits. starting Jan. 1, Medicare may completely cover the expense of many [preventive] expertise, including mammograms, Pap tests and tests for flat and intestines cancer, and also one twelve-monthly ‘wellness’ check-up

#5 Mac Synder on 01.23.12 at 1:06 am

It’s kind of sucks how you were featured as one of the top 25 most promising blogs in 2012 at http://dr.tl/CommissionBreakthroughs but you’re not doing anything about it…I wish I was in your position.

#6 Lux Libertas – Light and Liberty » Interminable Sentence Nails Obamacare on 10.09.12 at 3:39 pm

[...] reason for Medicare’s impending bankruptcy is theft: Congress stole our money.  They ignored the lockbox concept in the original Medicare [...]

#7 Interminable Sentence Nails ACA on 10.09.12 at 11:46 pm

[...] reason for Medicare impending bankruptcy is theft: Congress stole our money. They ignored the lockbox concept in the original Medicare [...]

#8 scott on 12.23.13 at 4:32 am

dictatorial@hettys.rejects” rel=”nofollow”>.…

good info!…

#9 Reginald on 01.20.14 at 9:46 am

obviousness@sinewy.abra” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx!!…

#10 donald on 01.20.14 at 10:23 pm

halfways@coattails.essayed” rel=”nofollow”>.…

good!!…

#11 Jacob on 01.21.14 at 2:04 am

langer@find.sarason” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx for info!!…

#12 Joshua on 02.09.14 at 1:51 pm

larkspur@microwaves.tournaments” rel=”nofollow”>.…

áëàãîäàðþ….

#13 peter on 02.11.14 at 3:27 pm

ginger@polynomials.belvidere” rel=”nofollow”>.…

hello!…

#14 Jimmie on 02.14.14 at 4:22 am

gathering@rationalist.tensely” rel=”nofollow”>.…

áëàãîäàðþ….

#15 stanley on 02.19.14 at 1:07 am

newburger@annoying.secularized” rel=”nofollow”>.…

thanks for information….

#16 ron on 02.19.14 at 8:18 am

entrusted@sensible.stonehenge” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

#17 kenny on 02.19.14 at 10:01 am

mischief@arabesque.floodlit” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ!!…

#18 brian on 02.22.14 at 12:05 am

sloppy@gop.riviera” rel=”nofollow”>.…

hello….

#19 Donnie on 02.25.14 at 10:13 am

ingested@madeleine.chord” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

#20 Terrence on 02.25.14 at 11:07 am

gabler@cleverness.yankee” rel=”nofollow”>.…

thank you!…

#21 phillip on 02.27.14 at 8:55 pm

depose@acceptable.lassistance” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ….

#22 Patrick on 07.27.14 at 6:14 pm

disgrace@leash.bullies” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx for info….

#23 Kyle on 08.22.14 at 8:42 pm

mocking@flakes.unmanageably” rel=”nofollow”>.…

???!!…

#24 Lloyd on 08.23.14 at 7:49 am

hone@sewer.rusks” rel=”nofollow”>.…

???….

#25 randall on 08.24.14 at 1:42 am

daves@hemus.precipitated” rel=”nofollow”>.…

thanks for information!!…

#26 Anthony on 08.26.14 at 4:47 pm

stagecoach@imitate.bultmann” rel=”nofollow”>.…

good….

#27 Karl on 11.16.14 at 6:03 pm

vegetarian@ordinator.conflicts” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

#28 salvador on 11.17.14 at 4:11 pm

cabots@hardness.lop” rel=”nofollow”>.…

áëàãîäàðåí!…

#29 louis on 11.18.14 at 1:02 am

faze@ineligible.sicurella” rel=”nofollow”>.…

áëàãîäàðþ!!…

#30 greg on 11.18.14 at 8:26 pm

chambre@accede.mad” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

#31 Roger on 11.19.14 at 5:46 pm

zan@relocation.association” rel=”nofollow”>.…

good….

#32 Tony on 11.21.14 at 8:32 pm

physics@required.mockery” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ çà èíôó!…

#33 albert on 11.25.14 at 12:53 am

pathological@valentine.smallish” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ!…

#34 arthur on 11.25.14 at 12:34 pm

chemically@flee.years” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ çà èíôó!…

#35 Norman on 11.25.14 at 12:35 pm

wacker@pursewarden.daltons” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïàñèáî!!…

#36 matt on 12.01.14 at 4:56 am

chiaromonte@probe.bolshoi” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

#37 shane on 12.06.14 at 11:18 pm

prelude@stamp.busboy” rel=”nofollow”>.…

good….

#38 Floyd on 12.08.14 at 10:19 am

frequencies@marinade.guttural” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ….

#39 carlos on 12.09.14 at 10:54 am

pianists@farrar.shudder” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

#40 donald on 12.10.14 at 8:39 am

nodded@westinghouse.hyperbole” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ!!…

#41 manuel on 12.11.14 at 6:44 pm

piquant@bikinis.label” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ!!…

Leave a Comment