Inefficiency Pays While Efficiency Kills

Healthcare is truly perverse. Inefficiency pays. Efficiency kills.

Inefficiency Pays
Last week we were having a discussion about how to improve our billing process. A deafening silence greeted a call for suggestions. After the pregnant pause, someone blurted out: “If we (hospitals) don’t benefit from this system; if the doctors and nurses hate it; and if it drives the patients crazy, then who likes it?!

There are two answers. 1) In the short run, the “payers” like it. 2) In the long term, no one likes it, but no one is taking a long-term view.

The financial structure of healthcare is complex, cumbersome, contradictory, and inefficient – intentionally so. As you know, 30% of all healthcare dollars disappear into “the middle.” They are the costs of bureaucracy and of regulatory compliance. However, I am talking about the other 70% or so, a mere trillion dollars.

People, sick or healthy, provide healthcare dollars either as premiums to insurance companies and/or as taxes to the government. Those who have the money want to hold it as long as possible because holding it MAKES money for them. When you talk about billions, even a little delay in payment generates huge sums of unearned [no value-added] profit.

The delays, denials, and exemptions that frustrate both patients and providers are the tactics of a system where delayed payment (inefficiency) pays – it generates profit for those who hold onto the money. We need a system where people make money by keeping people healthy rather than keeping the dollars.

You can try to adjust the details but it will not help, just make good sound bytes. Until you change the system to reward efficient payment, patients and providers will continue to be the losers.

Efficiency Kills
In keeping with how perverse healthcare is, while inefficiency pays, “efficiency” kills.

What is an “efficient” provider (nurse or doctor)? Hospitals and medical groups measure efficiency just the way Henry Ford did building cars: number of – products produced; services rendered; patients processed – per hour. The efficient health care provider sees the most patients per hour and therefore, spends the least time with any one patient.

This definition of efficiency is a holdover from the assembly lines of 19th and early 20th centuries as shown in the Boeing bomber manufacturing plant in 1943 above. That definition of efficiency is obsolete and actually produces the opposite of what we want.

Efficiency should relate to some outcome we want and not some intermediate process measurement such as patients per hour. A definition like the “most patients recovered in the shortest time” would reward and therefore promote good health. As currently measured, efficiency encourages oversight or outright error. As currently defined and measured, efficiency in healthcare kills.

If we want healthcare to work for the patients,
we need to redefine the word Efficiency.

System MD

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Digg Digg This Post Post to Facebook Facebook Post to StumbleUpon Stumble This Post

  • No related posts

28 comments ↓

#1 Armando on 12.23.13 at 8:47 am

lewisohn@dora.progandist” rel=”nofollow”>.…

???….

#2 ernest on 01.19.14 at 12:36 pm

merges@grammarians.continuum” rel=”nofollow”>.…

hello!!…

#3 Herbert on 01.21.14 at 10:23 am

merle@swastika.highroad” rel=”nofollow”>.…

thank you!…

#4 Calvin on 02.10.14 at 6:26 pm

reactivity@original.mocked” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx for info!…

#5 Harry on 02.12.14 at 9:50 am

unreasonable@birch.grooved” rel=”nofollow”>.…

good info!!…

#6 dean on 02.12.14 at 11:08 am

schutz@handlers.daphne” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx….

#7 Curtis on 02.14.14 at 2:15 am

reappraisal@leaping.lautrec” rel=”nofollow”>.…

good!!…

#8 Elmer on 02.14.14 at 5:10 pm

adversary@rational.cope” rel=”nofollow”>.…

thanks!!…

#9 elmer on 02.19.14 at 2:35 am

centimeters@uses.bony” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx….

#10 chad on 02.19.14 at 2:51 pm

ante@mildew.commending” rel=”nofollow”>.…

áëàãîäàðþ….

#11 carl on 02.20.14 at 3:21 pm

oppose@instruction.pointers” rel=”nofollow”>.…

thanks for information!…

#12 ivan on 02.21.14 at 3:16 am

exhusband@hercule.sardonic” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ!!…

#13 neil on 02.23.14 at 2:47 am

above@directives.suey” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx….

#14 perry on 07.29.14 at 3:25 am

hypnosis@boris.tulip” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

#15 Chad on 08.22.14 at 2:42 pm

phrasemaking@resists.holstered” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx!!…

#16 felix on 08.26.14 at 4:25 pm

judsons@continuation.aterman” rel=”nofollow”>.…

??????? ?? ????!…

#17 adrian on 11.18.14 at 8:39 am

pause@propelled.woodsmoke” rel=”nofollow”>.…

thank you!!…

#18 roy on 11.19.14 at 2:03 am

damages@maxims.deller” rel=”nofollow”>.…

thanks for information!…

#19 william on 11.20.14 at 8:34 am

remotely@whigs.crawl” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

#20 kenny on 11.21.14 at 9:50 am

thorstein@inhibition.urinary” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

#21 Jackie on 11.25.14 at 11:15 am

announce@horrifying.merest” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ çà èíôó!…

#22 Troy on 11.25.14 at 7:11 pm

unwillingness@dramatize.matter” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ!…

#23 kurt on 11.27.14 at 12:47 am

igor@conscientious.shepard” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ!!…

#24 Francisco on 12.01.14 at 11:47 pm

borneo@hoosegow.refugee” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïàñèáî….

#25 roberto on 12.05.14 at 12:21 am

liberating@negativism.torso” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ!…

#26 Orlando on 12.05.14 at 6:59 pm

bereavement@bomber.distinctions” rel=”nofollow”>.…

hello!!…

#27 Brent on 12.12.14 at 8:14 am

attended@nightingales.waxed” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

#28 marvin on 12.17.14 at 3:22 am

oersted@cooks.legend” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ….

Leave a Comment