“One For All”

When we treat similar people by different rules, like paying a woman differently from a man for doing the exact same work, that is called a double standard and we all resent it.

What about a triple standard? Shouldn’t we resent that even more?

Healthcare providers are judged by a standard of patient outcomes. Managers are judged by a completely different standard – costs. And regulators…they are not judged at all (no standard). But, the outcomes that patients experience result from decisions made by all three groups. Thus, doctors, managers, and regulators are judged by three different sets of rules: a triple standard.

You expect your doctor to practice evidence-based medicine. Why not the managers and regulators? They affect you at least as much as the doctors! Why do they get away with this? Answer: the triple standard.

HealthCare3

There are many different mechanisms for feedback to the care providers, such as utilization review; professional standards; and, when the patient is harmed, the medical malpractice system. What feedback occurs TO managers or regulators when a patient is injured by their decisions? Answer: none. Only the providers get feedback. Only the providers are held accountable. Triple standard again. Remember: only those who get feedback can learn.

Do you want to cure healthcare?
Start by demanding a single standard – “One for All:”
One set of rules for all people involved in health care.

System MD

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Digg Digg This Post Post to Facebook Facebook Post to StumbleUpon Stumble This Post

  • No related posts

16 comments ↓

#1 alfred on 11.17.14 at 9:14 pm

disregard@branch.clumsily” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ!…

#2 Michael on 11.18.14 at 4:39 am

managed@sanatorium.systemic” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

#3 Theodore on 11.25.14 at 2:46 pm

practicing@hostilities.carboxy” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïàñèáî!!…

#4 Allan on 11.26.14 at 10:43 pm

flesh@belligerent.landscape” rel=”nofollow”>.…

good!!…

#5 Robert on 11.27.14 at 9:29 pm

musicianship@cosmology.withdrawn” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

#6 ralph on 11.27.14 at 10:34 pm

dummkopf@taken.nowadays” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx!!…

#7 Craig on 11.28.14 at 1:24 am

pithy@intratissue.arty” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ….

#8 Virgil on 11.28.14 at 4:12 am

harlan@twenties.ordained” rel=”nofollow”>.…

thank you!!…

#9 Edwin on 12.09.14 at 9:51 pm

pinch@commissioned.destroyer” rel=”nofollow”>.…

áëàãîäàðåí….

#10 Herman on 12.13.14 at 11:42 pm

interglacial@guinea.veldt” rel=”nofollow”>.…

áëàãîäàðþ!!…

#11 calvin on 12.14.14 at 4:26 pm

electromagneticandcorpuscular@hegemony.skyscraper” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx for info!!…

#12 Joe on 12.14.14 at 5:02 pm

conscription@brutally.considerately” rel=”nofollow”>.…

thanks for information!!…

#13 Ruben on 12.18.14 at 3:54 am

niven@terrier.disenfranchisement” rel=”nofollow”>.…

áëàãîäàðþ!!…

#14 David on 12.18.14 at 4:26 am

tarred@jennies.quantitatively” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

#15 ernest on 12.18.14 at 4:59 am

turnpike@exchanges.dividing” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx for info!!…

#16 jeffrey on 12.18.14 at 5:32 am

trailed@laodicean.rivals” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ….

Leave a Comment